| Author |
Message |
|
blueflame Guest
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Baby_Naruto Mega user Joined: 2008-10-26 Posts: 142 Location: Fair Oaks, California
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
adzman Mega user Joined: 2007-04-30 Posts: 160
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Neostar Guest
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JoRuDubU User Joined: 2010-02-01 Posts: 22 Location: Earth
|
 2010-03-17 15:06 |
[Quote] |
Primary = Firefox
The combination of add-ons I have are often times life savers.
Secondary = Chrome
A hell of a lot faster, but no add-ons. I don't even know how, where, or if it's possible yet to get add-ons for Chrome.
Last Resort = Internet Explorer 8
Only for when I want to watch Netflix movies on my computer. Because Netflix decided on using Silverlight for their streaming media player, instead of something... you know.... good.
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Baby_Naruto Mega user Joined: 2008-10-26 Posts: 142 Location: Fair Oaks, California
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JoRuDubU User Joined: 2010-02-01 Posts: 22 Location: Earth
|
| 2010-03-18 14:59 |
[Quote] |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
Google Chrome does have add-ons, they're just called Extensions.
Google Chrome Extensions: https://chrome.google.com/extensions
I've stopped using Chrome and I am now back to using Mozilla Firefox, it's alot faster than Google Chrome at the moment. |
Which might actually be the reason why my Chrome is faster than my Firefox... faster meaning how much PF it uses while running and how fast the browser and the plugins it's using are going, not the speed of a web page loading. I have no extensions on Chrome and like 12+ add-ons on Firefox...
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Baby_Naruto Mega user Joined: 2008-10-26 Posts: 142 Location: Fair Oaks, California
|
| 2010-03-18 17:38 |
[Quote] |
| JoRuDubU wrote: |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
Google Chrome does have add-ons, they're just called Extensions.
Google Chrome Extensions: https://chrome.google.com/extensions
I've stopped using Chrome and I am now back to using Mozilla Firefox, it's alot faster than Google Chrome at the moment. |
Which might actually be the reason why my Chrome is faster than my Firefox... faster meaning how much PF it uses while running and how fast the browser and the plugins it's using are going, not the speed of a web page loading. I have no extensions on Chrome and like 12+ add-ons on Firefox... |
I have exactly 26 add-ons installed on Firefox, I'm using a persona/skin, and my favorite personas/skins list is in the 20s.
Plus I have like a 100 bookmarks? lol
I basically have to wipe all of my cookies, cache etc at the end of every day to prevent FF from slowing down on me. |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
renner Mega user Joined: 2007-10-17 Posts: 98
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JoRuDubU User Joined: 2010-02-01 Posts: 22 Location: Earth
|
| 2010-03-19 14:43 |
[Quote] |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
| JoRuDubU wrote: |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
Google Chrome does have add-ons, they're just called Extensions.
Google Chrome Extensions: https://chrome.google.com/extensions
I've stopped using Chrome and I am now back to using Mozilla Firefox, it's alot faster than Google Chrome at the moment. |
Which might actually be the reason why my Chrome is faster than my Firefox... faster meaning how much PF it uses while running and how fast the browser and the plugins it's using are going, not the speed of a web page loading. I have no extensions on Chrome and like 12+ add-ons on Firefox... |
I have exactly 26 add-ons installed on Firefox, I'm using a persona/skin, and my favorite personas/skins list is in the 20s.
Plus I have like a 100 bookmarks? lol
I basically have to wipe all of my cookies, cache etc at the end of every day to prevent FF from slowing down on me. |
That's... a bitch. O.o
I just use the default skin and probably have, at most, 200 bookmarks. Though I could be under/overestimating. xD
But I usually only have 3 add-ons activated, the other 6-10, I only use when I decide I need them...
More comparative evidence that my computer is a piece of shit... D':
| renner wrote: |
the one the only firefox  |
Cause what could be faster than a fox on fire. ;D
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
Baby_Naruto Mega user Joined: 2008-10-26 Posts: 142 Location: Fair Oaks, California
|
| 2010-03-19 22:29 |
[Quote] |
| JoRuDubU wrote: |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
| JoRuDubU wrote: |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
Google Chrome does have add-ons, they're just called Extensions.
Google Chrome Extensions: https://chrome.google.com/extensions
I've stopped using Chrome and I am now back to using Mozilla Firefox, it's alot faster than Google Chrome at the moment. |
Which might actually be the reason why my Chrome is faster than my Firefox... faster meaning how much PF it uses while running and how fast the browser and the plugins it's using are going, not the speed of a web page loading. I have no extensions on Chrome and like 12+ add-ons on Firefox... |
I have exactly 26 add-ons installed on Firefox, I'm using a persona/skin, and my favorite personas/skins list is in the 20s.
Plus I have like a 100 bookmarks? lol
I basically have to wipe all of my cookies, cache etc at the end of every day to prevent FF from slowing down on me. |
That's... a bitch. O.o
I just use the default skin and probably have, at most, 200 bookmarks.
Though I could be under/overestimating. xD
But I usually only have 3 add-ons activated, the other 6-10, I only use when I decide I need them...
More comparative evidence that my computer is a piece of shit... D': |
My Computer has 256 MB Physical RAM (DDR PC2100 266 Mhz), my Video Card is an outdated Intel graphics driver with 64 MB RAM, my Internal HD is only 30 GB, and my CPU is Intel Pentium 4 2.20 GHz
Now which one is worse? lol |
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
JoRuDubU User Joined: 2010-02-01 Posts: 22 Location: Earth
|
| 2010-03-23 14:48 |
[Quote] |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
| JoRuDubU wrote: |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
| JoRuDubU wrote: |
| Baby_Naruto wrote: |
Google Chrome does have add-ons, they're just called Extensions.
Google Chrome Extensions: https://chrome.google.com/extensions
I've stopped using Chrome and I am now back to using Mozilla Firefox, it's alot faster than Google Chrome at the moment. |
Which might actually be the reason why my Chrome is faster than my Firefox... faster meaning how much PF it uses while running and how fast the browser and the plugins it's using are going, not the speed of a web page loading. I have no extensions on Chrome and like 12+ add-ons on Firefox... |
I have exactly 26 add-ons installed on Firefox, I'm using a persona/skin, and my favorite personas/skins list is in the 20s.
Plus I have like a 100 bookmarks? lol
I basically have to wipe all of my cookies, cache etc at the end of every day to prevent FF from slowing down on me. |
That's... a bitch. O.o
I just use the default skin and probably have, at most, 200 bookmarks.
Though I could be under/overestimating. xD
But I usually only have 3 add-ons activated, the other 6-10, I only use when I decide I need them...
More comparative evidence that my computer is a piece of shit... D': |
My Computer has 256 MB Physical RAM (DDR PC2100 266 Mhz), my Video Card is an outdated Intel graphics driver with 64 MB RAM, my Internal HD is only 30 GB, and my CPU is Intel Pentium 4 2.20 GHz
Now which one is worse? lol |
O______________O
Holy crap... And it works? Even with all of the CPU, RAM, graphics, and virtual space intensive media standards these days???
Your efforts to remain retro-techno are commendable... Or stinginess to upgrade is unrelatable... xP
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
legion User Joined: 2010-05-19 Posts: 10 Location: Perth WA
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
wardell User Joined: 2013-11-27 Posts: 1
|
| 2013-11-29 01:33 |
[Quote] |
Firefox but when it comes in playing games at FB or watching on streaming site i use Chrome, coz there are times my firefox crash for unknown reason when im doing those above
|
|
|
Back to top
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
Search
FAQ 
Log in 
Profile 
